553
SEE
to excca do deid eriseal de
ENA TIDIEGO bad tedd ine ni Juų vie
IP rs mit 1c 14
:、?」:,、
SAJ
CAMPUNG Alusde Josiew Jeje koJMRİ FARGO JI
! Manor Ri Ji excuc necij ni 2*17JAG SJ3 of cens:JUS
had no reason whatever to believe that their books would be over-hauled.
I submit that the books having been shown to be proper and lawful evidence the Council was justified in attaching great importance to the circumstances under which they had been procured.
7.
With regard to the opinion expressed by the Secretary of State in paragraph 5 of His Lordship's Despatch that statements to the effect that payments had been made to Mr. Ward by a third party were accepted as evidence I should like to offer a short explanation.
The procedure followed was that books showing entries of payments made to Ward were put in by the witness Leung In and that he and other witnesses were then called to explain and verify those entries.
I may state that I was not conducting the case for the Crown before the Council and that I had seen none of the evidence beforehand nor was I aware what witnesses would be called nor what it was expected they would say.
I have however since the enquiry read over the evidence before the Sanitary Commission by Ko Sang and Leung In and I find that in connection with this charge the former spoke positively to four direct payments and the latter to five direct payments to Mr. Ward. These payments were alleged in each case to have been made by the hand of the witness himself.
This accounts for 9 out of the 16 payments laid in the charge.
It is true that before the Council Leung In denied that he had himself personally made any of these payments to Ward, though he spoke to having made other payments which form the subject of another charge.
Ko Sang again, when before the Council, only spoke to having made one payment, that of September 3rd, 1905.
553
SEE
to excca do deid eriseal de
ENA TIDIEGO bad tedd ine ni Juų vie
IP rs mit 1c 14
:、?」:,、
SAJ
CAMPUNG Alusde Josiew Jeje koJMRİ FARGO JI
! Manor Ri Ji excuc necij ni 2*17JAG SJ3 of cens:JUS
had no reason whatever to believe that their books would be over-
-hauled.
I submit that the books having been shown
!
༢༨""
CARTE IZLACK anno ted ensurat oa dedd ocean
to be proper and lawful evilence the Council was justified in
attaching great importance to the circumstances under which they
had been procured.
J
im
* 1 70 var tentar te lar 70 1984 tearste Breenidia
7.
کھول
-
DINOS Citaro
co en tien varmide on
of saturnos så anch na Job"Jear 334 n、
63701 10
Abbon 21 ad To 18 DI EILE CICE-
tay i
! 146 11. A
- cd blur Zu
BIUTC0209" 1. deted nod, even.
A mond eneQFT AKC FR 701 DOET JOU MAIDen 14 the Jagnj: 3
Mlubei to acadeLong Bad NOUN INI BACKPJUJLOHIO Ndu OT! AE
Berdua fuOUJIA
C/ 835 noda of ea18590 17 2017 1 BRU420-
LIE POAJ a gothaire enracizel (cü edu ekte, u*J*****
REACTO
cu Levine erea eraro.Jua seand
Ben aliw it in
Jatra 2ucivola pit JUOHJIA
muni antu talved bas
+
14.
*1th regard to the opinion expressed by the
Secretary of State in paragraph 5 of His Lordship's Despatch
that statements to the effect that payments had been made to Mr.
Ward by a third party were accepted as evidence 1 should like to
offer a short explanation.
The procedure followed was that books show-
-ing entries of payments male to hard were put in by the witness
Leung In and that he and other witnesses were then called to
explain and verify those entries.
I day state that I was not conducting the
case for the Crown before the Council and that I had seen none
of the evilence before hand nor was I aware what witnesses would
be called nor what it was expected they would say,
i have however since the enquiry read over
the evidence before the Sanitary Commission by Ko Sang and Leung
In and i find that in connection with this charge the former spoke positively to four direct payments and the latter to five
direct payments to Mr. Ward. These payments were alleged in each.
case to have been made by the hand of the witness hisself.
This accounts for 9 out of the 16 payments
lail in the charge.
ud tar TENEgídervai pilkwosudi era norabiḥlut
Ta ucdw zacri 27
1 CAN * WIE OU
sit en CiuİORAZ DEA 3.3 1
CPC 20 TIL A
BLUENJIA
It is true that before the Council Leung In
denied that he had himself personally made any of these payrants
to Ward
-
though he spoke to having made other payments which
form the subject of another charge.
Ko Sang again, when before the Council,
oni, spoke to having made one payment that of September 3rd.
1905.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.